Sunday, October 21, 2007

If capitalism has grown to itself represent perhaps the greatest (underlying) problem of the day, is capitalism adaptable enough to fix itself?

What governs spirit, spirits government, no?

Reed Burkhart (just one reed among many :-)

Perhaps, paying attention to what governs our spirits (individually or collectively) may be the best way to evolve what spirits our governments.

This discussion seems close to the collective heartbeat of humanity: the evolving alignment or misalignment between the spirits of individuals and the collective spirit of humanity.

If money and its culture tend to define the collective spirit of humanity, is it perhaps true that humanity's spirit tends to be "governed" today by whatever particular capitalist culture (American capitalism, Chinese capitalism, etc.) each of us finds ourself living in?

Everyone would probably agree that our current governing capitalist culture/s (which some have termed the corporatocracy) are still evolving, no? Perhaps to smartocracy? democracy? autocracy? anarchy? monarchy? ____-cracy?

Shoshana Zuboff has researched and written on the historical evolution of capitalism from what she calls Mercantile Capitalism (spirited by valuing trading) to Proprietary Capitalism (spirited by small-scale manufacturing) to the current Managerial Capitalism (spirited by mass-scale manufacturing) -- pointing out capitalism's robustness due to its inherent adaptability to address problems of the day.

The great question I see is the following: "if capitalism has grown to itself represent perhaps the greatest (underlying) problem of the day, is capitalism adaptable enough to fix itself?" I wonder if Joseph Schumpeter (or Morihei Ueshiba, for that matter) ever asked himself this self-Schumpeterian question.

Recasting the same question with terms such as government and spirit, "is the entrepreneurial spirit of mankind sufficient to excite reform of our popular-culture-governing contemporary capitalist culture?"

Can we capitalists (viewing us all as somewhat warranting -- albeit to lesser or greater degrees -- the moniker "capitalist" rather by default, living as we are in a capitalist age in a capitalist society) see far enough, deeply enough and cleverly enough to proactively evolve contemporary culture (including evolving our policies and practices of corporatocratic government especially evolving its relationship to truth, i.e., spirituality) to realign our spirits as individuals so that our efforts are more strategically working towards a global realignment of individual spirits and the collective spirit of humanity?

I hold great optimism for such spiritual realignment, sensing the immense power born of the inherent spiritual connection between the individual and humanity as a whole ... a power surely more than sufficient to enable such a shift -- a spirited renaissance that evolves our governing capitalist culture -- to occur.

After all, the power of common interest enabled the evolution of capitalism from proprietary to managerial form: via subversion of the former by the latter in the market through spirited strategies of mass scale, high-volume, low unit cost (with byproducts of monoculturalization, high-growth, and sometimes the depletion of human and natural resources).

Is it not possible that the next stage evolution of capitalism could be innovated to respond to a step change realization of truth in commerce: shape-shifting amoral capitalism -- by consciously leveraging any sublimely-spirited "invisible hand"-like forces spiriting or governing the universe? Say for example the invisible one-two punch that we can't keep pumping up the CO2 forever? Or other?

How does the spirit that governs each of us -- perhaps telling us that we need to change things somehow -- get into that influential sphere of the spirit governing government: to engage in some type of Aikido, perhaps, with the spirit of the corporatocracy?

How? Any ideas? Is it possible that this transformation is already occuring, or beginning to occur?

(This was first posted at Reality Sandwich http://www.realitysandwich.com/life_during_wartime#comment-1634 )

1 comment:

Tom Wayburn said...

Hi Reed,

Thanks for the nice letter earlier.

The answer to your question depends upon whether or not capitalism can eliminate the four causes of growth: (We understand that growth in a finite world is not sustainable.)

1. Fractional reserve banking, which requires growth to retire debt.

2. Unemployment caused by increases in productivity due to technological development, which must be ameliorated by the creation of new jobs.

3. Inequality, which can be tolerated so long as those with less are assured they will have more in the future, which requires growth.

4. The stock market, which requires growth to ensure that stocks appreciate in the long run regardless of economic cycles.

According to Ted Trainer in the file called IPCC-CRIT.html in the folder tsw, which is in the root directory ssis.art.unsw.edu.au capitalism is not only unsustainable but it cannot be made sustainable.

Best regards,
Tom Wayburn, Houston, Texas

P.S. You have a nice website.